78 Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2371 (1980). Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, Pub. L. No. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971). Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, 522 U.S. 520 (1998). Anderson, R. T. (2007). Alaska native rights, statehood, and unfinished business. Tulsa Law Review, 43(1), 17–42. Anderson, R. T. (2016). Sovereignty and subsistence: Native self-government and rights to hunt, fish, and gather after ANCSA. Alaska Law Review, 33(2), 188–227. Blum, J. (2021, December 8). A reflection on ANCSA at 50. The National Law Review. Chaffee, E. C. (2008). Business organizations and tribal self-determination: A critical reexamination of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. Alaska Law Review, 25, 107–155. Davis, S. (2007). Sustainable development. In: Sustainable development: State and tribal initiatives. National Conference of State Legislatures. Hensley, W. L. (1966, May). What rights to land have the Alaska Native? The primary issue [Unpublished research paper]. University of Alaska Fairbanks. Ongtooguk, P. (1986). The annotated ANCSA: How the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act came about. United Nations. (2012). The future we want. U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015, September). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. ADRIAN DE VERA SUAREZ graduated from Lehigh University in May 2022 with a B.A. in theatre and minors in economics and global studies. He is also the chief marketing officer of the Iacocca Global Village, where he has led project teams and consulted for multiple international initiatives. His plethora of global experiences includes being a UN youth representative; a public health intern in Kenya; and a consultant for clients in Germany, the United States, India, Peru, and his hometown in the Philippines. Adrian is currently pursuing his M.S. in business analytics at Lehigh University. corporations, ANCs have not only lasted but also thrived. Now regional corporations play a central role in providing economic stability and maintaining traditional norms and values, playing an influential role in Alaskan politics. Throughout ANCSA’s more than 50-year history, there have been advantages and disadvantages with the execution of its intended purpose—to provide economic opportunity and cultural preservation for Native Alaskans through the provision of land and federal funding. Thus, it has undoubtedly remained relevant despite its many shortcomings. The multiple amendments have displayed the dynamic needs of the Alaska Native people. And like the history of Alaska, ANCSA will have to remain resilient and be adaptable to change to meet the future sustainability demands of the next seven generations of Native Alaskans. References
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTA0OTQ5OA==