Perspectives Vol 43 Resilient Taiwan

83 MARTINDALE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE Taiwanese and how the island can preserve its democratic values. Becoming sovereign would be a heavy burden. How does a country even become a country? International law experts identify four main characteristics of statehood: people, territory, government, and sovereign capacity for relations with other states. Through intimidation and inciting fear, Beijing blocks Taiwan from engagement with other nations and participation in world organizations. China is Taiwan’s largest trading partner, a member of the UN, and a global superpower that Taiwan would not want to antagonize by separating. However, unification would mean exchanging a democratic government for communism. The Taiwanese identity, especially indigenous cultures, would likely be suppressed and replaced with Chinese customs. Furthermore, unification would disrupt the global economy. Taiwan is a critical hub for maritime trade and semiconductors, both vital to global supply chains. China absorbing Taiwan could foment widespread instability, including trade sanctions and shifts in geopolitical alliances. Questions about preserving Taiwan’s cultural identity and economy under Chinese rule remain unanswered (Collins & Erickson, 2024). Taiwanization and indigenization policies are in place and museums erected, but how would unification alter these aspects of Taiwan as the world knows it? Maintaining the status quo offers a precarious balance between sovereign independence and survival. Taiwan’s future hinges on its ability to sustain the mutually reinforcing relationship between collective identity and human rights. The largest swath of voters is those who remain impartial to unification or separation. They may ultimately be swayed not by abstract political considerations but by concrete questions about the effects on Taiwan’s distinctive rights-protecting democracy. However, the status quo has its challenges too: military drills, international isolation, and exploitation of Taiwan’s technology, geography, and people (Stockton, 2002). At the heart of Taiwan’s human rights dilemma lies the question of identity. As the island navigates external threats and internal divisions, fostering a cohesive sense of identity becomes essential. Taiwan’s future depends on balancing autonomy while addressing the aspirations and concerns of its people, defining itself on its own terms for both its citizens and the watching world. References Chang, A., Jonaki M., Yu, M., & Jarenwattananon, P. (2024, January 17). Members of one Indigenous tribe in Taiwan reflect on their identity. NPR. Chang, B. (2004). From Taiwanisation to de-sinification. China Perspectives, 2004, 1–19. doi:0.4000/chinaperspec tives.438 Cheung, H. (2017, June 11). Taiwan in time: Curing a ‘deeply poisoned’ populace. Taipei Times. China-linked threat group targets Taiwan critical infrastructure, smokescreen ransomware. (n.d.). CyCraft.com. Chiu, S., Chiang, W. (2012). Representations of the name rectification movement of Taiwan Indigenous people: Through whose historical lens? Language and Linguistics 13, 523–568. Civil movements. (2018, April 14). OFTaiwan.org. Collins, G., & Erickson, A. S. (2024). Annexation of Taiwan: A defeat from which the US and its allies could not retreat. Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy. doi:10.25613/56E8-WC54 Council of Indigenous Peoples. (2025). Introduction of indigenous peoples. Countries and territories. (n.d.). Freedom House.org. Davidson H. (2021, October 22). Fearful but defiant: Life goes on in Taiwan despite China’s threats. The Guardian. Davis, M. C. (2022). Hong Kong: How Beijing perfected repression. Journal of Democracy, 33, 100–115. doi:10.1353/ jod.2022.0007 Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. (2025, January 13). Taiwanese/Chinese identity (1992/06~2024/12). Funaiole, M. P., Hart, B., Peng, D., Bonny Lin, & Verschuur, J. (2024, October 10). Crossroads of Commerce: How the Taiwan strait propels the global economy. Center for Strategic & International Studies. Fukuyama, F. (2018). Why national identity matters. Journal of Democracy, 29, 5–15. Hernández, J. C. (2016, June 25). China suspends diplomatic contact with Taiwan. The New York Times. Herskovitch, B. (2023, December 11). Don’t let China veto Australia’s ties with Taiwan. The Intrepreter. Hsiao, R. (2024a). A preliminary assessment of CCP political warfare targeting Taiwan’s 2024 elections. Global Taiwan Brief, 9. Hsiao, R. (2024b). Three domestic implications of Taiwan’s 2024 presidential and legislative elections. Global Taiwan Brief, 9. Huang, J.-N. (2023). China’s propaganda and disinformation operations in Taiwan: A sharp power perspective. China: An International Journal, 21, 143–170. doi:10.1353/ chn.2023.a898346 Jones, L., & Krulikowski, S. (2024). Taiwan—The Silicon Island. US International Trade Commission. Kuo, L. (2024, May 19). Life in Taiwan is rowdy and proud, never mind China’s threats. The Washington Post.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTA0OTQ5OA==